A crash/perf bug report reveals Geedge's MAAT rule engine (libmaatframe.so, using Intel Hyperscan for literal/regex matching) running with 545,441 FQDN blocking rules and 404,141 IP address blocking rules loaded in a single instance as of 2024; loading 500,000 new FQDN rules via the full Hyperscan path took ~95 minutes, addressed by an automatic fallback to a second engine ("Rulescan") above 50,000 rules.
table:<TSG_OBJ_FQDN> rule_count:545441 ... table:<TSG_IP_ADDR> rule_count:404141 ... maat内部对expr规则使用双引擎（Hyperscan+Rulescan），当规则条目大于5万时，设计上自动启用Rulescan
Defense implications
- Confirms Geedge maintains FQDN/IP blocklists at 500K+ entry scale via Hyperscan-based matching — domain/IP evasion (domain fronting, IP rotation) faces a system built for large-scale pattern matching, not a small curated list.
Related findings
The internal 'MAAT网络流处理配置统一描述框架' engineering manual (v3.1.20, author 郑超, 2021) documents MAAT's Redis-synced rule-compilation framework and its RuleScan/Hyperscan-based pattern-matching engine (libmaatframe.so / librulescan), and records that RuleScan's fast-scan feature caused a production outage on 2019-03-19 and has been disabled ever since.
The GitLab group itself is named "K18_NTCS_WEB" (K18 = Kazakhstan), and its "nfs" web app implements per-protocol keyword-filter configuration classes (App/FTP/Mail/P2P/SSL keyword configs), an OpenVPN IP-list config, RADIUS-based logging/reporting entities, MAAT rule-sync beans, and an explicit "IP spoofing" business feature with its own "PXY仿冒地址池" (proxy spoofed-address pool) and dedicated policy-log support -- the single strongest piece of evidence in this batch tying named keyword-filtering plus IP-spoofing capabilities directly to the Kazakhstan deployment.
Session-log exports from a Beijing test/demo TSG device ("XXG-TSG-BJ") show live "Deny" enforcement actions (security_rule_list "Deny_VPNHero", "deny_TowerVPN") against traffic the app-ID engine classified with nested app chains "VPNHero" and "OPENVPN.TowerVPN.Psiphon Provider.Psiphon-Server" -- i.e. TowerVPN is specifically tagged internally as riding on Psiphon infrastructure, and both it and VPNHero are actively blocked, not just logged, on this device.
An internal TSG operations/troubleshooting manual lays out TSG's full traffic pipeline (NIC -> mrzcpd/marsio capture driver -> sapp DPI engine -> firewall/proxy(KNI->TFE)/active-defense/WAN-NAT policy branches) and shows engineers using maat_redis_tool to pull the live Redis-synced blocking policy tables (TSG_SECURITY_COMPILE, TSG_OBJ_IP_ADDR, TSG_OBJ_APP_ID) and filter them by numeric policy/object ID to debug why a block rule isn't firing.
certstore's own commit history documents its transparent-TLS-MITM mechanics directly: it writes the client's observed SNI into the SAN field of the leaf certificate it mints on the fly, supports ECC issuance (secp192r1/secp256r1) for those forged certs, and reads its Trusted/Untrusted decryption-keyring configuration from MAAT's DECRYPTION_KEYRING table -- confirming the interception pipeline end-to-end: client SNI in, matching forged certificate out, gated by MAAT-synced keyring policy.
Side-by-side internal performance comparison across Xinjiang (China Mobile carrier deployment, hostname cmcc-xj-server1-sapp-244), Fujian (domestic), and Ethiopia (E21) explicitly references the same 'app_sketch_maat' diagnostic log format at all three sites, confirming the identical AppSketch app-fingerprinting stack is used for domestic Xinjiang surveillance and for the exported Ethiopia deployment.