An internal TSG functional-requirements spec ('加密协议JG') defines device support for identifying and blocking ECH, ESNI and QUIC traffic via per-connection SNI/region-matching tables (e.g. DF_QUIC_REGION), plus a companion 'FD报文全流程感知' feature that both passively monitors and actively injects synthetic verification traffic end-to-end through the network path to compute a live per-rule 'CT率' (breakthrough/penetration rate) — the system self-measures how often its own QUIC/ESNI/ECH blocks fail to take effect, and separately throttles logging/blocking detail for rule IDs receiving unusually high hit counts (DF_ATTACK_PROTECTION, 'targeted attack detection').

A production feature spec ("加密协议JG") requires detection-and-control capability for QUIC, ESNI, and ECH, with a per-connection log field c_encrypt_type explicitly distinguishing ClientHello encryption (0=unencrypted, 1=ESNI, 2=ECH) and a DF_QUIC_REGION rule table matching QUIC by SNI. The system computes a per-rule "CT" (穿透/penetration) rate from paired mirror-vs-functional RST-packet logs (TF-RST-LOG / TF-MIRROR-RST-LOG) to grade each block rule's effectiveness, and runs continuous active-verification probes against its own rules, deliberately varying the probe 4-tuple each run "to ensure it doesn't hit the blacklist" so the verification traffic itself reaches the target.

An internal TSG operations/troubleshooting manual lays out TSG's full traffic pipeline (NIC -> mrzcpd/marsio capture driver -> sapp DPI engine -> firewall/proxy(KNI->TFE)/active-defense/WAN-NAT policy branches) and shows engineers using maat_redis_tool to pull the live Redis-synced blocking policy tables (TSG_SECURITY_COMPILE, TSG_OBJ_IP_ADDR, TSG_OBJ_APP_ID) and filter them by numeric policy/object ID to debug why a block rule isn't firing.

TSG automatically generates recurring weekly "SNI Report of Overseas APP" and companion "Server IP and Location of Overseas APP" reports at what is almost certainly a China-national (not export-customer) scale — single weekly runs process from ~5.7 trillion to over 135 billion rows and up to ~775TB/week — breaking down QUIC.SNI/SSL.SNI/HTTP.Host traffic per named blocked-in-China platform (YouTube, Facebook, Google, Twitter, Instagram, Telegram, WhatsApp, Netflix, BBC, Viber, Line, Snapchat, Gmail, HBO, and more), down to individual CDN edge hostnames (e.g. specific scontent-*.fbcdn.net and rr*---sn-*.googlevideo.com nodes ranked by bytes). The report series recurs weekly from at least Feb 2023 through Mar 2024.

The Xinjiang Mobile carrier traffic report (2023-05-15) states in its own QUIC-domain-ranking section that Xinjiang's intra-provincial traffic has begun carrying QUIC/HTTP3 (UDP-based) traffic that poses "a huge challenge" to the traditional parallel/out-of-band ("并联") traffic-access blocking method, and that effectively gatekeeping ("GK") UDP/QUIC traffic requires switching to an inline/in-path ("串联") blocking architecture — a direct internal admission that (as of mid-2023, in this province) the standard mirror-tap deployment could not reliably block QUIC.

A MESA Lab thesis/report states that ESNI/ECH protocol-identification technology, based on TLS extension field type numbers, "has already been applied in actual projects," and lists the researcher's own project participation as "G1系统 - ESNI、ECH加密协议识别" (Feb-Aug 2023) and "G1系统 - QUIC协议旁路ZD" (Feb-Nov 2023, QUIC bypass/blocking), plus a separately implemented "DNS主动探测模块" (DNS active-probing module, marked 已实现/already implemented). "G1" also appears independently as a named legacy system in the Maat/Transformer DPI header (PROTO_VPN comment: "G1历史遗留"), corroborating it as a real internal system name, not a typo.

TSG's firewall 'Deny' security-policy action is confirmed implemented via three interchangeable mechanisms: TCP RST injection, forged HTTP 404 response-page injection, and DNS-redirect. Confirmed via commits to MESA_Platform/sapp and tsg/tsg-os-buildimage GitLab repos (git.mesalab.cn).